Rose’s strategy of preventive medicine
Rose’s strategy of preventive medicine
复制标题
罗斯的预防医学策略
DOI:
10.1007/s10654-009-9349-4
复制
发表时间:
2009
影响因子:
13.6
通讯作者:
P. Elliott
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
P. Elliott
This new edition of Geoffrey Rose’s seminal book is very welcome. Accompanied by a commentary by Kay-Tee Khaw and Michael Marmot, it rightly leaves Rose’s original text untouched. How well does his text translate more than 15 years on? The answer is very well indeed. As Khaw and Marmot illustrate in their commentary, the basic premise that most diseases and causes are continuously distributed in the population, and that mass diseases require mass (population-wide) solutions, is as true today as it was 15 or so years ago. Like Khaw and Marmot, I was privileged to be one of Geoffrey’s students in epidemiology, and re-reading the book today (at one sitting, recommended) his wise words and clear and razor-sharp thinking jump off the page, as if attending one of his renowned lectures. Not long after completing my M. Sc. in epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, where Geoffrey was professor and head of department, I remarked to him that epidemiology was really quite difficult (I recall I was dealing with the vagaries of measurement error and repeated measurements, at the time, in preparation for the INTERSALT study). He looked at me clearly surprised and replied that on the contrary epidemiology was really very easy. Geoffrey excelled at making difficult concepts readily accessible, and this is one of the great strengths of this book. As Geoffrey acknowledges in the book, his ideas on the population approach to prevention took shape during the famous debate between Pickering and Platt in the 1950s on the nature of hypertension. Pickering’s idea that hypertension was not in itself a disease, but merely one end of a continuous distribution of blood pressure, was revolutionary at the time. As Rose illustrates with his own data from the Whitehall study, the risk of stroke and coronary heart disease associated with raised blood pressure increases continually across the whole blood pressure range, and is not restricted to those with the highest pressures. Thus addressing the population blood pressure problem requires a population-wide and not just a ‘high-risk’approach (ie, treating people with hypertension). He gives the example of reducing salt intake in the population as a low-cost and effective means of reducing population blood pressure levels. Over 15 years later, this is now government policy in the UK, both through a public health campaign by the Food Standards Agency and voluntary efforts of the food industry to reduce the amount of sodium in manufactured foods (together with use of food labelling, another of Geoffrey’s calls to action). Rose extends his population-wide concept to prevention through other examples in cardiovascular disease (serum cholesterol), mental health and bone health among others. In each he demonstrates the core concept of his thesis: large numbers of people, each at small excess risk of disease, produce many more cases at the population level than a few individuals at high risk (even though individually they have most to gain from a preventive measure). Again, mass diseases require mass solutions. Using alcohol as an example, he argues cogently that the prevalence of problem drinkers reflects the norms of drinking behaviour in a society—the population mean predicts the number of ‘deviants’—and Khaw and Marmot in their commentary show evidence that the same is also true for problem gambling.