Response to Scheel et al.
Response to Scheel et al.
复制标题
对 Scheel 等人的回应
DOI:
10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.048
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Reid VM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Reid VM
Scheelet al.[1] highlight three types of methodological concern with the work reported in our recent paper [2], related to analytical decisions, fetal behavior, and how light interfaces with maternal tissue. Here we outline why the issues raised do not detract from our originally reported conclusions. In our view, the procedural and analytical decisions that we made in our study [2] were the most appropriate given the uncharted territory that we explored. The best test of methodological robustness of our approach would be replication by another laboratory.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Simion, F;Valenza, E;Umiltà, C
通讯作者:
Umiltà, C
影响因子:
9.2
作者:
O. Braddick
通讯作者:
O. Braddick
影响因子:
9.2
作者:
Anne M. Scheel;Stuart J. Ritchie;Nicholas J. L. Brown;S. Jacques
通讯作者:
S. Jacques
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
N. Reissland;B. Francis;Louisa E Buttanshaw
通讯作者:
Louisa E Buttanshaw