Role of an abstract order schema in conceptual judgment.
Role of an abstract order schema in conceptual judgment.
复制标题
抽象顺序模式在概念判断中的作用。
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.20.6.1283
复制
发表时间：
1994
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Nordlie,J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dopkins,S;Pollatsek,A;Nordlie,J
在顺序信息与逻辑无关的情况下，被试进行同异判断。在实验1和2中，刺激的判断任务是来自一个有序的一组概念，从长期记忆（美国总统下令的历史时间的维度）;在实验3和4中的刺激来自两个有序的概念集。在每个实验的刺激集中，每个概念都有几个关联短语，任务是判断这些短语是否与相同的概念（实验1，2和3）或相同的排序（实验4）配对。即使概念属于不同的排序，反应“不同”的时间也随着概念之间的顺序距离而减少。它的结论是，相同的不同的判断是部分基于非模态顺序信息（即，不绑定到任何特定的尺寸）。提出了两种隐含顺序模式的模型，并进行了测试。
Ss performed same–different judgments for which order information was logically irrelevant. In Experiments 1 and 2, the stimuli for the judgment task were derived from an ordered set of concepts from long-term memory (US presidents ordered on the dimension of historical time); in Experiments 3 and 4 the stimuli were derived from two ordered sets of concepts. In the stimulus set for each experiment, there were several associate phrases for each concept and the task was to judge whether the phrases were paired with the same concept (Experiments 1, 2, and 3) or the same ordering (Experiment 4). The time to respond “different” decreased with the ordinal distance between the concepts even when the concepts belonged to different orderings. It is concluded that same–different judgments are based in part on amodal order information (ie, not tied to any particular dimension). Two models of the implicated order schema are proposed and tested.