Relationship between parental report of food neophobia and everyday food consumption in 2-6-year-old children
Relationship between parental report of food neophobia and everyday food consumption in 2-6-year-old children
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00048-5
复制
发表时间:
2003-10-01
期刊:
影响因子:
5.4
通讯作者:
Gibson, EL
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cooke, L;Wardle, J;Gibson, EL
A substantial body of research has examined ‘food neophobia’in children, a personality trait, manifesting as avoidance of unfamiliar foods. Although the data are not entirely consistent, there is some evidence for the existence of age differences in neophobia (Cashdan, 1994) which appears to be minimal in infancy, rising rapidly at around the age of 2 and gradually tailing off thereafter. This developmental pattern is similar to age changes in the frequency of accidental poisonings (Cashdan, 1998) and is consistent with the suggestion that neophobia has a protective function, since the years between 2 and 5 see children becoming increasingly independent and able to decide for themselves what (and what not) to put in their mouths. Despite the fact that early childhood may represent a sensitive period in the development of food preferences (Cashdan, 1994), there has been very little research into the effect of neophobia on consumption of specific foods or on everyday food choices in this age group. Falciglia, Couch, Gribble, Pabst, and Frank (2000) attempted to investigate the impact of neophobia on dietary variety in 9–10 year olds. They found that overall Healthy Eating Index scores were lower for a neophobic group than for average and neophilic groups. Significant contributors to this difference were lower dietary variety and higher consumption of saturated fat in neophobic children, despite no difference in their intake of meat or dairy foods, or total energy.In two studies of Swedish children with wider age ranges (2–17 years), food neophobia in both mothers and children was associated with lower numbers of uncommon foods being served in the family home (Koivisto & Sjödén, 1996) and with less likelihood of having eaten specific foods from