A new explanation of perceptual transparency connecting the X-junction contrast-polarity model with the luminance-based arithmetic model
A new explanation of perceptual transparency connecting the X-junction contrast-polarity model with the luminance-based arithmetic model
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-5884.2005.00286.x
复制
发表时间：
2005-09-01
影响因子：
0.8
通讯作者：
Kitaoka, A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kitaoka, A
应用基于亮度的感知透明度算术模型解释了Adelson-Anandan-安德森的X结对比极性模型，该模型从现象学的角度对感知透明度进行了分类.由此可以很好地理解在唯一透明的结构中两个表面的视深度顺序是固定的原因。此外，为什么两个表面的表观深度顺序是可逆的配置的非透明的，也可以很好地解释通过引入一个新的分类的感知透明度，区分全层透明从对象的透明度。一个半透明的实验表明，物体透明优于全层透明.研究还揭示了影响知觉透明度的两个因素：相邻区域的平均亮度或亮度，以及它们之间的亮度或亮度差异。此外，它似乎迈克尔逊对比度不起关键作用的知觉透明度。
The luminance- based arithmetic model of perceptual transparency was applied to explain Adelson- Anandan- Anderson's X- junction contrast- polarity model, which classifies perceptual transparency on a phenomenological level. As a result, the reason why the apparent depth order of two surfaces is fixed in the configuration of unique transparency could be well understood. Moreover, the reason why the apparent depth order of two surfaces is reversible in the configuration of bistable transparency could also be well explained by introducing a new classification of perceptual transparency that differentiates full- layer transparency from object transparency. An experiment of bistable transparency revealed that object transparency is preferred to full- layer transparency. It also revealed two factors affecting perceptual transparency: average lightness or luminance of adjacent regions, and the difference in lightness or luminance between them. In addition, it appeared that Michelson contrast does not play a critical role in perceptual transparency.