Attributional style in depression: a meta-analytic review.
Attributional style in depression: a meta-analytic review.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.50.5.974
复制
发表时间：
1986-05
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
P. Sweeney;Karen Anderson;Scott Bailey
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Sweeney;Karen Anderson;Scott Bailey
在本文中，我们报告了归因风格与抑郁症关系的荟萃分析。在涉及近 15,000 名受试者的 104 项研究中，一些归因模式与抑郁症评分具有可靠的关联。对于负面事件，内部、稳定和全局原因的归因与抑郁症有可靠且显着的关联。对能力和运气归因因素进行测量的研究也表明与抑郁症存在可靠的关联。对于积极事件，外部、不稳定和特定原因的归因与抑郁有关。积极事件的能力和运气归因因素也与抑郁有关。然而，积极事件的关系弱于消极事件的相应关系。一般来说，这些关系模式独立于本文作者提出的许多潜在中介因素，包括研究对象的类型（精神病学与大学生）、归因事件的类型（真实与模拟）、使用的抑郁措施或研究报告的出版状态。这些结论与其他评论的结论进行了比较。讨论了抑郁症归因模型的含义。
In this article we report meta-analyses of the relation of attributional styles to depression. In 104 studies involving nearly 15,000 subjects, several attributional patterns had reliable associations with depression scores. For negative events, attributions to internal, stable, and global causes had a reliable and significant association with depression. Studies in which the attribution factors of ability and luck were measured also showed a reliable association with depression. For positive events, attributions to external, unstable, and specific causes were associated with depression. Ability and luck attribution factors for positive events were also associated with depression. The relations for positive events, however, were weaker than the corresponding ones for negative events. In general, these patterns of relations were independent of a number of potential mediators suggested by authors in this literature, including the type of subject studied (psychiatric vs. college student), the type of event about which the attribution is made (real vs. simulated), the depression measure used, or the publication status of the research report. These conclusions are compared with those of other reviews. Implications for attributional models of depression are discussed.