Assessing the Believability of Standardized Patients Trained to Portray Communication Disorders.
Assessing the Believability of Standardized Patients Trained to Portray Communication Disorders.
复制标题
评估接受过描述沟通障碍培训的标准化患者的可信度。
DOI：
10.1044/2017_ajslp-16-0068
复制
发表时间：
2017
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Yorkston,Kathryn
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Baylor,Carolyn;Burns,MichaelI;Struijk,Jennie;Herron,Lindsay;Mach,Helen;Yorkston,Kathryn
PurposeThe的目的是评估可信度的标准化患者描绘个人与沟通障碍的一个更大的研究，标准化患者帮助培训医疗和专职健康学生关于communicationdisorders.MethodTwo妇女描绘的人与失语症，和2名男子描绘的人与构音障碍与帕金森氏病。两个利益相关者团体对可信度进行了评级。语言病理学家对在线视频的可信度进行了评级。失语症的人评价失语症的视频在人与researchers.ResultsTargeted可信度为80或更高（0-100规模; 0 =根本不可信，100 =非常可信）。对于言语-语言病理学家评分，平均评分达到了目标的失语症特征的描述找词问题，语法错误，非言语交流，和整体的写照，但不是听觉理解问题。言语运动减少、响度降低、语调降低、情感平淡和整体描述等构音障碍特征符合描述目标，但语速未达到。描述同一病例的不同标准化患者的评分在大多数特征上没有显著差异。失语症患者的评分是高度可变的。ConclusionStandardized患者谁没有沟通障碍，可以描绘障碍的特点，在一个可信的方式。
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the believability of standardized patients portraying individuals with communication disorders as part of a larger study in which standardized patients help train medical and allied health students about communication disorders.MethodTwo women portrayed persons with aphasia, and 2 men depicted persons with dysarthria associated with Parkinson's disease. Two stakeholder groups rated believability. Speech-language pathologists rated believability of videos online. Persons with aphasia rated aphasia videos during in-person sessions with the researchers.ResultsTargeted believability was 80 or higher (0–100 scale; 0 =not at all believable, 100 =very believable). For speech-language pathologist raters, average ratings met the target for the portrayals of the aphasia characteristics of word-finding problems, agrammaticism, nonverbal communication, and overall portrayal but not for auditory comprehension problems. Targets for the portrayals were met for the dysarthria characteristics of reduced speech movements, reduced loudness, reduced intonation, flat affect, and overall portrayal but not for speech rate. Ratings for different standardized patients portraying the same case were not significantly different from each other on most characteristics. Ratings from persons with aphasia were highly variable.ConclusionStandardized patients who do not have communication disorders can portray disorder characteristics in a believable manner.