Putting Evidence Academies into action: Prostate cancer, nutrition, and tobacco control science
Putting Evidence Academies into action: Prostate cancer, nutrition, and tobacco control science
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105848
复制
发表时间：
2019-12-01
影响因子：
5.1
通讯作者：
Melvin, Cathy L.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Glanz, Karen;Green, Sarah;Melvin, Cathy L.
将公共卫生研究付诸实践的一个有据可查的挑战是在临床实践和社区中实施研究结果所需的时间延长。证据学院模型（Rohweder等人，2016年），开发和首次使用在北卡罗来纳州，是一个务实的，以行动为导向的模式，旨在缩短这一时间轴的沟通，直接向那些谁可以使用他们和召集个人在一个单一的主题领域工作，网络和规划未来的活动。宾夕法尼亚大学癌症预防和控制研究网络合作中心（CPCRN）基于证据学院模式举办了三次会议：2015年关于前列腺癌的会议，2017年关于食物获取和肥胖预防的会议，以及2018年关于烟草控制科学的会议。一个由利益相关者组成的多元化规划委员会帮助确定了每次会议的内容、重点和形式。地方和国家专家向区域研究人员、从业人员、政府领导人和社区成员介绍了调查结果。每个证据学院都包括来自其他预防研究中心（PRC）和CPCRN网络站点的合作者和演讲者。评价和成果表明，这些活动成功地实现了目标，并促进了与会者之间的持续关系。本文件说明了证据学院模式在不同区域的使用情况，并介绍了通过证据学院并在参与者的投入下开展的经验教训和后续活动。所吸取的经验教训可能有助于制定和评价证据学院模式的未来调整和/或其组成部分的有效性。
A well-documented challenge in moving public health research into practice is the extended time it takes to implement findings in clinical practice and communities. The Evidence Academy model (Rohweder et al., 2016), developed and first used in North Carolina, is a pragmatic, action-oriented model that aims to shorten this timeline by communicating cutting-edge findings directly to those who can use them and convening individuals working in a single topic area to network and plan activities for the future. The University of Pennsylvania Collaborating Center of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) held three conferences based on the Evidence Academy model: one about prostate cancer in 2015, a second on food access and obesity prevention in 2017, and a third about tobacco control science in 2018. A diverse planning committee of stakeholders helped shape the content, focus,and format of each conference. Local and national experts presented findings to regional audiences of researchers, practitioners, government leaders, and community members. Each Evidence Academy included collaborators and speakers from other Prevention Research Centers (PRCs) and CPCRN network sites. Evaluations and outcomes indicated that the events were successful in achieving their goals and fostered ongoing relationships among attendees. This paper illustrates how the Evidence Academy model was used in a different region and describes lessons learned and follow-up activities that were initiated via the Evidence Academy and with input from participants. Lessons learned may be helpful in developing and evaluating future adaptations of the Evidence Academy model and/or the effectiveness of its components.