Experimental comparison between tractional and compressive stress on temporomandibular joint
Experimental comparison between tractional and compressive stress on temporomandibular joint
复制标题
颞下颌关节拉应力与压应力的实验比较
DOI:
10.1111/odi.12650
复制
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Nogami S Yamauchi K Shimizu Y Hirayama B Kumasaka A Iikubo M Kumamoto H Takahashi T
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Saito A;Oki A;Nakamura T;Onodera S;Shino H;Hasegawa D;Kosaki K;Onda T;Watanabe A;Shibahara T;Sueishi K;Azuma T;齋藤暁子,大木章生,中村貴,小野寺晶子,篠宏美,長谷川大悟,小崎健次郎,恩田 健志,渡邊 章,柴原孝彦,末石研二,東俊文;大木章生,坂本輝雄,長谷川大悟,柴原孝彦,東俊文,末石研二;青木栄人,鈴木瑛一,久永幸乃,佐藤正敬,小野寺晶子,篠宏美,齋藤暁子,齋藤淳,東俊文;Nogami S Yamauchi K Shimizu Y Hirayama B Kumasaka A Iikubo M Kumamoto H Takahashi T
ObjectiveWe experimentally compared the effects of compressive and tractional mechanical stress on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) of rabbits to assess the etiology of progressive condylar resorption.Materials and MethodsWe performed a cortical osteotomy using custom‐made devices that were lengthened by 0.25 mm every 12 h for 1 week after surgery. During this time, the rabbit TMJ was under compressive or tractional mechanical stress. The samples in each group were examined using micro‐computed tomography and histological staining.ResultsScores for the area of bone resorption were higher in the compressive group than in the tractional group. Moreover, scores for the depth of bone resorption were higher in the compressive group than those in the tractional group. We observed a significantly higher prevalence of resorption in the subcondylar bone in the compressive group than in the tractional group. There were substantially more cells that were positive for tartrate‐resistant acid phosphatase in the compressive group than in the control and tractional groups.ConclusionsThe outcomes here suggest that excessive mechanical stress, particularly compressive mechanical stress, may significantly affect morphological bone change findings in the TMJ.