Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits
Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits
复制标题
DOI：
10.5751/es-06390-190237
复制
发表时间：
2014-05
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
C. Redman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Redman
可持续性科学和复原力理论被视为互补的方法已变得普遍。有时这些术语可以互换使用。虽然这两种方法有一些共同的工作原理和目标，但它们也基于一些关于系统运行的不同假设，以及我们如何最好地引导这些系统走向未来。每种方法都将受益于一些学者将可持续性科学和复原力理论分开，并专注于进一步发展其独特性，而其他学者则继续将其结合起来进行探索。遵循不同的程序可能有益的三个研究领域是：是否优先考虑结果或系统动态，如何最好地利用社区投入，以及更多地使用过去的知识作为潜在创新的实验室。
It has become common for sustainability science and resilience theory to be considered as complementary approaches. Occasionally the terms have been used interchangeably. Although these two approaches share some working principles and objectives, they also are based on some distinct assumptions about the operation of systems and how we can best guide these systems into the future. Each approach would benefit from some scholars keeping sustainability science and resilience theory separate and focusing on further developing their distinctiveness and other scholars continuing to explore them in combination. Three areas of research in which following different procedures might be beneficial are whether to prioritize outcomes or system dynamics, how best to take advantage of community input, and increasing the use of knowledge of the past as a laboratory for potential innovations.