Researcher × <i>Tojisha</i>: How does Fukushima connect with the world?

Researcher × <i>Tojisha</i>: How does Fukushima connect with the world?
复制标题

研究员×<i>Tojisha</i>:福岛如何与世界联系?

DOI:
10.11225/cs.2020.011
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
坊農真弓・福島智
坊農真弓・福島智
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kushida;S.;Kawashima;M.;Abe;T.;北村隆憲;坊農真弓・福島智

文献摘要

相似文献

福岛聪(福岛)是一个聋哑的人,他在9岁时失去了视力,然后在18岁时失去了听力。他使用手指盲文与听力和视力正常的对话者进行交流,这项研究基于对2015年与第一作者(波诺)的口译对话数据的分析,探讨了福岛与世界的联系。我们的分析集中在两个关键问题上:(1)福岛是如何通过翻译向采访者提问的,包括与他人发起的修复概念相关的问题(Schegloff et al., 1977);(2)在谈话过程中,福岛的问题如何根据他对给定主题的知识状态而有所不同,这与行动中的认识论概念有关(Heritage, 2012a, 2012b)。最后的讨论将通过Bono和福岛之间的反思性对话进行,该对话于2019年录制。此外,在以往使用会话分析(CA)和交互研究的研究中,研究人员倾向于避免参与自己的数据,以防止分析中潜在的偏差。然而,本文建议互动分析师不应该远离与现实世界中的实际参与者接触,并且可能能够提供有价值的观点,特别是由于他们对行为的仔细意识和观察。因此,本文旨在帮助弥合CA/相互作用研究与Tojisha研究之间的鸿沟。
Satoshi Fukushima (Fukushima) is a deafblind man who lost his sight when he was 9 years old, and then his hearing at 18. He uses finger braille to communicate with hearing and sighted interlocutors and this study examines how Fukushima connects with the world based on analyses of data from an interpreter-mediated dialogue with the first author (Bono), which was video-recorded in 2015. Our analysis focuses on two key queries:(1) How did Fukushima ask a question of the interviewer via his interpreters, including questions that are related to the concept of other-initiated repair (Schegloff et al., 1977);(2) During the conversation, how did Fukushima's questions differ depending on the state of his knowledge about a given topic, which is related to the concept of epistemics in action (Heritage, 2012a, 2012b). The concluding discussion will be sharpened through a reflective dialogue between Bono and Fukushima, which was video-recorded in 2019. In addition, in previous studies employing conversation analysis (CA) and interaction studies, researchers have tended to avoid participating in their own data in order to prevent potential bias in their analysis. However, this paper suggests that interactional analysts should not stay away from engaging with actual actors in the real world and may be able to provide valuable perspectives, especially due to their careful awareness and observations of actions. As such, this paper aims to help bridge the divide between CA/interaction studies and Tojisha studies.