How Strong is the Relationship between General Phonological Processes and Pseudo-word Reading?
How Strong is the Relationship between General Phonological Processes and Pseudo-word Reading?
复制标题
一般语音过程与伪词阅读之间的关系有多强？
DOI：
10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.077
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D.Roberts
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D.Roberts
语音阅读障碍（Phonological Dyslexia，PD）是一种获得性阅读障碍，其特征是异常强烈的词汇效应，即，与受损的伪字阅读相对保留的真实的的字阅读（Beauvois和Derouesne，1979）。阅读的并行分布模型（Harm & Seidenberg，2001）提出了强有力的主张，PD是由于一个普遍的，非阅读特定的缺陷，以中央语音表征，表现在伪字阅读由于固有的高要求，他们对语音系统。根据这种解释，语音受损的患者应该表现出受损的伪词阅读，反之亦然。与这一观点相一致，语音缺陷经常与PD共同发生（Friedman，1996）。相反，双途径模型认为，PD可能是由于字素-音素转换过程（亚词汇阅读过程）的缺陷，而不一定意味着一般的语音缺陷。我们提出了两个案例，直接挑战语音赤字的观点。
Phonological dyslexia (PD) is an acquired reading disorder characterised by an abnormally strong lexicality effect, i.e., with impaired pseudo-word reading contrasting with relatively preserved real word reading (Beauvois & Derouesne, 1979). Parallel distributed models of reading aloud (Harm & Seidenberg, 2001) have made the strong claim that PD is due to a general, non-reading specific deficit to central phonological representations which manifests during pseudo-word reading due to the inherently high demands they place on the phonological system. Under this account, patients with impaired phonology should show impaired pseudo-word reading and vice-versa. Consistent with this view, phonological deficits frequently co-occur with PD (Friedman, 1996). In contrast, dual route models posit that PD may result from a deficit to grapheme-phoneme conversion processes (sublexical reading process) that does not have to implicate a general phonological deficit. We present two cases that directly challenge the phonological deficit view.