Changes in Recurrence Score by neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer and their prognostic implication

Changes in Recurrence Score by neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer and their prognostic implication
复制标题

DOI:
10.1136/esmoopen-2018-000476
复制
发表时间:
2019-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
7.3
通讯作者:
Toi, Masakazu
Toi, Masakazu
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ueno, Takayuki;Saji, Shigehira;Toi, Masakazu

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景新辅助内分泌治疗(NET)可以改善绝经后激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的手术结局。NET后Ki 67标记指数较基线时具有更好的预后能力。然而,它仍然是未知的,是否与治疗后的样品多基因检测可以预测预后比pretreatmentsamples.Methods的预后价值的多基因检测肿瘤型DX复发评分(RS)进行了研究,使用治疗前和治疗后的样品从多中心NET试验,JFMC 34 -0601结果治疗前和治疗后的RS均与无病生存率(DFS)显著相关(分别为p=0.005和0.002)。治疗前和治疗后RS的组合也是DFS的预测因子(p=0.002),并且上级于术前内分泌预后指数(PEPI)。此外,在三种RS中,组合RS是多变量分析中唯一的独立预后因素(p=0.04)。此外,联合RS可以区分高危组的早期复发和中危组的中/晚期复发,结论治疗前后RS的联合检测可为预测DFS和区分高危组和中危组的早期复发提供关键信息。中危组激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者的晚期复发。需要进行更大规模的研究来验证结果。
Background Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) can improve surgical outcomes in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The Ki67 labelling index after NET has a better prognostic power than that at baseline. However, it remains unknown whether a multigene assay with post-treatment samples could predict the prognosis better than that with pretreatment samples.Methods The prognostic value of the multigene assay Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS) was investigated using pretreatment and post-treatment samples from a multicentre NET trial, JFMC34-0601 (UMIN C000000345), where exemestane was given at 25 mg/day for 24 weeks.Results Both pretreatment and post-treatment RSs were significantly associated with disease-free survival (DFS) (p=0.005 and 0.002, respectively). The combination of pretreatment and post-treatment RSs was also a predictor of DFS (p=0.002) and superior to preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI). Furthermore, combined RS was the only independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis among the three RSs (p=0.04). In addition, combined RS could differentiate early recurrence in the high-risk group from mid/late recurrence in the intermediate-risk group, suggesting possible differential treatment strategies based on the risk categories indicated by the combined RS.Conclusions The combination of pretreatment and post-treatment RSs could provide pivotal information for predicting DFS and differentiating early recurrence in the high-risk group from mid/late recurrence in the intermediate-risk group in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. A larger study is required to validate the results.