Surgical approaches for neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Surgical approaches for neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
复制标题
新生儿先天性膈疝的手术方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
DOI:
10.1007/s00383-015-3765-1
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
Usui N.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Terui K;Nagata K;Ito M;Yamoto M;Shiraishi M;Taguchi T;Hayakawa M;Okuyama H;Yoshida H;Masumoto K;Kanamori Y;Goishi K;Urushihara N;Kawataki M;Inamura N;Kimura O;Okazaki T;Toyoshima K;Usui N.
PurposeThe optimal surgical approach for neonatal congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of endoscopic surgery (ES) for neonatal CDH.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. Studies that compared surgical approaches for neonatal CDH were selected. Mortality and recurrence of herniation were analyzed as primary endpoints. Each study was evaluated following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system.ResultsEight observational studies comparing ES and open surgery (OS) met the criteria. As compared with the OS group, the ES group showed both a significantly lower mortality rate [risk ratio (RR) 0.18, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.09–0.38,p< 0.0001] and a significantly higher recurrence rate (RR 3.10, 95 % CI 1.95–4.88,p< 0.00001). However, serious selection bias was seen in seven of the eight studies—because the indication of ES had been determined intentionally, the ES groups may have included less severe cases.ConclusionAlthough the evidence was insufficient, ES was clearly associated with more recurrence than was OS. Therefore, ES should not be the routine treatment for every neonate. It is crucially important to select suitable cases for ES.