Corruption in the aftermath of war: an introduction
Corruption in the aftermath of war: an introduction
复制标题
战后腐败：简介
DOI：
10.1080/01436597.2014.921421
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Camilla Orjuela
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jonas Lindberg;Camilla Orjuela
“战争后的腐败”汇集了一个跨学科的学者小组，探讨冲突后社会中的腐败动态。本引言讨论了五个主题，提出问题并总结了所包括的10篇文章的主要发现。首先，我们讨论了腐败概念的问题，涉及其道德内涵和定义的模糊性，并提出将腐败视为一种集体行动困境，以避免这些道德方面的问题。其次，我们讨论了冲突后的社会，并强调了“和平”这个标签可以指代的各种各样的“和平”。我们认为，冲突后社会中腐败的原因、动态和影响与其他社会中的腐败有许多相似之处，但冲突后的情况往往会加剧和巩固与腐败有关的问题。第三，我们分析了国际干预者和国内行动者之间的动态，并展示了国际国内关系中的矛盾和紧张。第四，我们认为，在研究冲突后社会时，不平等、不信任和腐败之间的内在联系值得考虑，尤其是不平等更值得关注。最后，我们讨论了作者在冲突后社会腐败研究中遇到的一些方法论挑战。
‘Corruption in the aftermath of war’ brings together an interdisciplinary group of scholars to enquire into the dynamics of corruption in post-conflict societies. This introduction discusses five themes, problematising and summarising key findings from the 10 articles included. First, we discuss the problems with the corruption concept, related to its moralising connotations and definitional vagueness, and propose viewing corruption as a collective action dilemma as a way of avoiding these moralising aspects. Second, we discuss post-conflict societies, and highlight the great varieties of ‘peace’ that that label can refer to. We suggest that the causes, dynamics and effects of corruption in post-conflict societies bear many similarities with those in other societies, but that the post-conflict situation often generates an intensification and entrenchment of corruption-related problems. Third, we analyse the dynamics between international interveners and domestic actors, and show the contradictions and tensions in international–domestic relations. Fourth, we argue that the inter-linkages between inequality, mistrust and corruption deserve consideration in the study of post-conflict societies, and that inequality in particular merits more attention. Finally, we discuss some methodological challenges encountered by the contributors in their studies of corruption in post-conflict societies.