The exchange of planning ideas from Europe to the USA after the Second World War: introductory thoughts and a call for further research
The exchange of planning ideas from Europe to the USA after the Second World War: introductory thoughts and a call for further research
复制标题
第二次世界大战后欧洲与美国的规划思想交流：介绍性想法和进一步研究的呼吁
DOI：
10.1080/02665433.2014.886522
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
0.8
通讯作者：
C. Hein
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Hein
第二次世界大战后，规划思想的跨国交流是多方位的。正如这期特刊所展示的那样，当美国的观念在全球传播的同时，欧洲的观念也在稳步地向美国转移。美国的欧洲移民和美国专业人士探索了欧洲市中心的重建，特别是在北方。这个特刊建立在对跨国规划历史日益增长的兴趣之上，包括发展研究和写作方法的愿望。目前的问题包含了一个概述二级文献（韦克曼），战后专业跨大西洋对话（乔赫）的仔细调查，在国际联合会住房和规划会议于1958年在海牙举行的研究（瓦格纳），并检查整个英语世界的城市设计的术语和概念（奥里拉德）。导言还提出了进一步的研究方向，有意识地与不断变化的全球背景相结合，并研究其对超越物理，理论，时间或其他边界的规划的影响，例如，讨论跨越冷战分裂的规划者和计划。它还呼吁全球整合研究工具，并在该领域的研究人员之间开展合作。
The transnational exchange of planning ideas after the Second World War was multi-directional. As this special issue demonstrates, while American concepts spread globally there was also a steady transfer of European ideas to the USA. European émigrés in the USA and American professionals explored the reconstruction of European downtowns, particularly in Northern Europe. This special issue builds on a growing interest in transnational planning history, including a desire to develop research and writing methods. The current issue contains an overview of secondary literature (Wakeman), a careful investigation of post-war professional transatlantic dialogue (Joch), research on the International Federation for Housing and Planning conference held in The Hague in 1958 (Wagner), and an examination of the term and concept of urban design throughout the Anglophone world (Orillard). The introduction also proposes further directions for research that consciously engages with changing global contexts, and studies their impact on planning beyond physical, theoretical, temporal or other boundaries, for example, discussing planners and plans that crossed the schism of the Cold War. It also calls for global integration of research tools and collaboration among researchers in the field.