Measurement of ERP latency differences:: A comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods
Measurement of ERP latency differences:: A comparison of single-participant and jackknife-based scoring methods
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00618.x
复制
发表时间：
2008-03-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Brisson, Benoit
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kiesel, Andrea;Miller, Jeff;Brisson, Benoit
我们使用计算机模拟来评估不同的程序来测量具有代表性的事件相关成分（听觉和视觉N1，P3，N2 pc和频率相关的P3差波）的起始潜伏期的变化。这些程序包括几种技术，以确定发作lavage结合使用单参与者平均波形和折刀子样本平均波形的方法。通常，基于折刀的方法结合相对准则技术或结合分数面积技术（J.C.汉森公司Hillyard，1980; S. J. Luck，2005）提供了最准确的方法和最大的统计功效，没有I类错误率的膨胀。
We used computer simulations to evaluate different procedures for measuring changes in the onset latency of a representative range of event-related components (the auditory and visual N1, P3, N2pc, and the frequency-related P3 difference wave). These procedures included several techniques to determine onset latencies combined with approaches using both single-participant average waveforms and jackknife-subsample average waveforms. In general, the jackknife-based approach combined with the relative criterion technique or combined with the fractional area technique (J.C. Hansen & S.A. Hillyard, 1980; S.J. Luck, 2005) provided the most accurate method and the greatest statistical power, with no inflation of Type I error rate.