Procrastination Revisited: A Commentary
Procrastination Revisited: A Commentary
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/ap.12208
复制
发表时间：
2016-02-01
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Mann, Leon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mann, Leon
这篇评论连接了两项关于学业拖延的研究，Beswick，Rothblum和Mann（1988）研究了学业拖延的前因，Steel（2016）专注于学业拖延的人格相关性。作者指出了拖延研究领域增长的原因，讨论了拖延的定义，然后对上述两项关于学业拖延的研究进行了评论。在评估拖延研究领域的现状和未来方向时，作者讨论了行为和决策拖延之间的关系和测量，拖延的领域特异性或领域一般性，以及该领域超越学术拖延研究进入其他领域的必要性，如拖延是一个主要问题的疾病和健康，最后，对拖延的跨文化差异进行了评论，并对该领域进行了总结。
This commentary connects two studies of academic procrastination, Beswick, Rothblum and Mann (1988), which studied the antecedents of academic procrastination, and Steel (2016), which focuses on the personality correlates of academic procrastination. The author identifies reasons for growth in the field of procrastination research, discusses definitions of procrastination, and then comments on the two studies of academic procrastination identified above. In assessing current status and future directions in the field of procrastination research, the author discusses the relationship between and measurement of behavioural and decisional procrastination, the domain specificity or domain generality of procrastination, and the need for the field to move beyond studies of academic procrastination into other domains such as illness and health where procrastination is a major problem, then ends with a comment on cross-cultural differences in procrastination and a summary conclusion about the field.