Offender risk assessment - Guidelines for selection and use

Offender risk assessment - Guidelines for selection and use
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/0093854802029004002
复制
发表时间:
2002-08-01
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
Bonta, J
Bonta, J
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bonta, J

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

过去 20 年来,罪犯评估领域取得了重大进展。因此,这些知识使该领域能够制定指导方针,以确定有用和有效的罪犯评估工具的特征。作者关于什么构成良好评估的建议范围从无争议的(例如精算工具)到更有争议的(例如减少对静态风险量表的依赖)。无论读者是否同意所表达的观点,希望实证论据的力量至少能引起一些仔细的思考,而不是草率地驳回它们。
During the past 20 years, there have been significant developments in the area of offender assessment. As a result, this knowledge has placed the field in a position to construct guidelines as to what should characterize useful and effective offender assessment instruments. The author's suggestions as to what constitutes good assessment ranges from the noncontroversial (e.g., actuarial instruments) to the more contentious (e.g., lessening one's reliance on static risk scales). Whether the reader agrees with the views expressed, it is hoped that the force of the empirical arguments will at least provoke some careful consideration rather than summarily dismissing them.