DONKEY PRONOUNS UNBOUND

DONKEY PRONOUNS UNBOUND
复制标题

驴代词不受束缚

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1988
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Shalom Lappin
Shalom Lappin
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Shalom Lappin

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

为了建立意义结构的主题理论模型,必须引入原语。如果我们在词汇层次上操作,我们可以把词元作为原语。设LEX是一组固定的词法。由于一个自创生实体要想有效,一个情境的“抽象结构”必须沉淀一组抽象实体,这些抽象实体代表概念并被视为类型,其中词汇是相应的标记,因此必须引入CONC CP(LEX)。所有可能的组合的集合,被认为是词汇的集合,又是P(LEX)。文本可以看作是P(LEX)中满足某些一致性公理的元素。设TEXT C P(LEX)为文本的集合。由于相容性是单调的(JLEX,TEXTy是一个拓扑空间。通过把每个概念看作一个离散的拓扑空间,e.一个空间,其中每个子集是开放的,我们可以把它看作是一个层(JLEX,TEXTy),其中一个局部同胚是由一个实例化inst和一个文本嵌入函数emb的组合给出的。由于每个子集都是开的,所以它也是它自己的开邻域,这被inst ° emb映射到文本中,这是LEX的开集。因此,局部同胚模型决定了给定概念的实例化何时出现在文本中的操作。意向的意义性符号学模型的原始对象正是这些层。对于这些对象之间关系的建模,我们必须考虑到它们必须通过自组织机制生成,并且这种机制的出发点必须是它们在文本中的语用使用,即关系的生成必须基于搭配。对于由A、B之间的^ 6 LEX上下文间关系生成的(%)f素过滤器,可以通过以下方式生成e CONC:
In order to build a topos theoretical model of a meaningfulness structure the primitives must be introduced. If we operate on the lexical level we may take lexems as our primitives. Let LEX be a fixed set of lexems. Since for an autopoietic entity to be efficient the "abstract structure" of a situation must be sedimented a set of abstract entities, representing concepts and considered as types, where the lexems are the corresponding tokens, will have to be introduced as CONC C P (LEX). The set of all possible syntagmas, conceived as sets of lexems, is again P (LEX). The texts can be considered as those elements of P (LEX), which satisfy some consistency axioms. Let TEXT C P (LEX) be the set of texts. Since consistency is monoton (JLEX, TEXTy is a topological space. By taking each concept as a discrete topological space, i. e. a space where each subset is open, we may view it as a sheaf over (JLEX, TEXTy, whereby a local homeomorphism is given by a composition of an instantiation inst and a text-embedding function emb. Since each subset is open it is also its own open neighborhood and this is mapped by inst ° emb into a text, which is an open set of LEX. A local homeomorphism models thus an operation that determines when an instantiation of a given concept appears in a text. The primitive objects of the intended semiotic model of meaningfulness are exactly these sheaves. For the modelling of relations between these objects we must take into account that they must be generated by a self-organizing mechanism, and the starting point for this mechanism must be their pragmatical use in texts, i.e. the generation of the relations will have to be based on collocations. For (%) f prime filter generated by ^ 6 LEX intercontextual relations between A, B e CONC can be generated by: