Open Government Data as an Innovation Process: Lessons from a Living Lab Experiment
Open Government Data as an Innovation Process: Lessons from a Living Lab Experiment
复制标题
开放政府数据作为创新过程：来自实验室实验的经验教训
DOI：
10.1080/15309576.2019.1568884
复制
发表时间：
2020-05-03
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Meijer, Albert
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ruijer, Erna;Meijer, Albert
开放政府数据据称有助于透明度、公民参与、协作、经济和公共服务发展。从创新的角度，我们探讨了当前开放政府数据的承诺和实践之间的差距。基于战略利基管理（SNM），我们确定了开放数据创新过程中的不同阶段。本研究使用了一个生活在荷兰的一个省的实验室，以刺激提供和使用开放数据的协作过程，并分析了这种创新过程的成功条件的机制。基于两年期间的六项干预措施的结果表明，我们的干预措施刺激了开放数据的使用，提高了政府内部的认识，但各种机制抑制了开放政府数据雄心的实现。我们的结论是，开放政府数据作为一种创新的挑战在于找到一种方法来扩大开放数据的提供：创新利基的建立，但“政权更迭”不发生。扩大开放式政府数据的使用需要强有力的管理承诺和更广泛的组织环境的变化，例如制定正式和非正式规则以及促进关于开放式数据做法的辩论的技术发展。
Open government data are claimed to contribute to transparency, citizen participation, collaboration, economic and public service development. From an innovation perspective, we explore the current gap between the promise and practice of open government data. Based on Strategic Niche Management (SNM), we identify different phases in the open data innovation process. This study uses a living lab in a province in the Netherlands to stimulate the provision and use of open data for collaborative processes and analyses the mechanisms that condition the success of this innovation process. The results based on six interventions over a period of two years show that our interventions stimulated the use of open data and raised awareness within government, but that various mechanisms inhibited the realization of the ambitions of open government data. We conclude that the challenge of open government data as an innovation lies in finding a way to scale up the provision of open data: innovation niches are established but "regime changes" do not take place. Scaling up open government data use requires strong managerial commitment and changes in the wider organizational landscape such as constructing formal and informal rules and technological developments that stimulate debate about open data practices.