Specialisation and diversity of multiple trophic groups are promoted by different forest features.
Specialisation and diversity of multiple trophic groups are promoted by different forest features.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/ele.13182
复制
发表时间：
2018-11
期刊：
影响因子：
8.8
通讯作者：
C. Penone;E. Allan;S. Soliveres;M. Felipe‐Lucia;M. Gossner;S. Seibold;Nadja K. Simons;P. Schall;Fons van der Plas;P. Manning;R. D. Manzanedo;S. Boch;D. Prati;C. Ammer;J. Bauhus;F. Buscot;M. Ehbrecht;K. Goldmann;Kirsten Jung;Jörg C Müller;Jörg C Müller;Rodica Pena;A. Polle;S. Renner;Liliane Ruess;Ingo Schönig;M. Schrumpf;E. Solly;M. Tschapka;W. Weisser;T. Wubet;M. Fischer
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Penone;E. Allan;S. Soliveres;M. Felipe‐Lucia;M. Gossner;S. Seibold;Nadja K. Simons;P. Schall;Fons van der Plas;P. Manning;R. D. Manzanedo;S. Boch;D. Prati;C. Ammer;J. Bauhus;F. Buscot;M. Ehbrecht;K. Goldmann;Kirsten Jung;Jörg C Müller;Jörg C Müller;Rodica Pena;A. Polle;S. Renner;Liliane Ruess;Ingo Schönig;M. Schrumpf;E. Solly;M. Tschapka;W. Weisser;T. Wubet;M. Fischer
虽然森林管理强烈影响生物多样性，但目前尚不清楚管理引起的结构和组成变化如何影响不同的群落维度（例如丰富度、专业化、丰度或完整性）以及类群之间的差异。我们评估了 150 个管理类型不同的温带森林地块中九个森林特征（代表林分结构、异质性和树木组成）对 13 个地上和地下植物、动物、真菌和细菌营养类群的影响。树冠覆盖的光照资源减少，这增加了群落的专业化，但降低了总体多样性和丰富度。增加资源类型和多样化微生境（橡树和针叶树混合）的特征很重要，并且主要影响丰富度。地下群体对地上群体的反应不同，对大多数森林特征的反应较弱。我们的结果表明，我们需要考虑森林特征而不是广泛的管理类型，并强调考虑多个群体和社区维度的重要性，以更好地为保护提供信息。
While forest management strongly influences biodiversity, it remains unclear how the structural and compositional changes caused by management affect different community dimensions (e.g. richness, specialisation, abundance or completeness) and how this differs between taxa. We assessed the effects of nine forest features (representing stand structure, heterogeneity and tree composition) on thirteen above- and belowground trophic groups of plants, animals, fungi and bacteria in 150 temperate forest plots differing in their management type. Canopy cover decreased light resources, which increased community specialisation but reduced overall diversity and abundance. Features increasing resource types and diversifying microhabitats (admixing of oaks and conifers) were important and mostly affected richness. Belowground groups responded differently to those aboveground and had weaker responses to most forest features. Our results show that we need to consider forest features rather than broad management types and highlight the importance of considering several groups and community dimensions to better inform conservation.