Shopping While Black: Applying 42 U.S.C. § 1981 to Cases of Consumer Racial Profiling
Shopping While Black: Applying 42 U.S.C. § 1981 to Cases of Consumer Racial Profiling
复制标题
黑人购物：将 42 U.S.C. § 1981 应用于消费者种族定性案例
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2003
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Anne
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Anne
本文介绍了消费者种族貌相（CRP）的做法，试图量化它，并确定其原因和影响。作者介绍了针对Cracker Barrel Old Country Stores的案例，以说明现代消费者歧视的本质。该条确定了适用的法律，并评估了原告在每种理论下获胜的可能性。结论是1866年《民权法》第1981条为CRP原告提供了最佳的恢复机会，文章包括根据1990年以来制定的判例法对Cracker Barrel提出的第1981条索赔进行分析。文章指出，在消费者骚扰案件中，CRP原告很少胜诉的原因，并得出结论，联邦法院必须更广泛地解释该法规，以确保正如1866年的一项民权立法所规定的那样，“黑人手中的一美元将购买与白色手中的一美元相同的东西
This Article describes the practice of Consumer Racial Profiling (CRP) by attempting to quantify it and to identify its causes and its effects. The author presents the case against Cracker Barrel Old Country Stores to illustrate the nature of modern-day consumer discrimination. The Article identifies the applicable laws and assesses the likelihood that plaintiffs will prevail under each theory. Concluding that § 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 offers CRP plaintiffs the best chance for recovery, the Article includes an analysis of the § 1981 claims against Cracker Barrel based on the case law developed since 1990. Noting the reasons why few CRP plaintiffs succeeded in cases of consumer harassment, the Article concludes that the federal courts must construe the statute more broadly to ensure, as set forth in a piece of civil rights legislation from 1866, "that a dollar in the hands of a Negro will purchase the same thing as a dollar in the hands of a white