Parafoveal and foveal processing of abbreviations during eye fixations in reading: making a case for case.
Parafoveal and foveal processing of abbreviations during eye fixations in reading: making a case for case.
复制标题
阅读时眼睛注视期间的缩写的旁中心和中心凹处理：逐一论证。
DOI：
10.1037/a0023215
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Rayner,Keith
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Slattery,TimothyJ;Schotter,ElizabethR;Berry,RaymondW;Rayner,Keith
采用眼动实验研究了阅读中缩略语的加工过程。缩写有两种不同的类型：首字母缩略词（可以用正常的字形音素对应[GPC]规则阅读的缩写，如NASA）和缩写（GPC是字母名称的缩写，如NCAA）。使用边界变化范例（K。Rayner，1975）。使用这种范式，缩略语的预览要么与缩略语相同（NASA或NCAA），要么在拼写上是法律的（NUSO或NOBA），要么是非法的（NRSB或NRBA）。缩略语以大写字母字符串的形式出现在正常的、主要是大写字母的句子中，也出现在所有大写字母的句子中，这样缩略语在视觉上就不会有明显的区别。结果表明，首字母缩略词和首字母缩写词在阅读过程中经历不同的加工，读者可以调节他们的加工基于低层次的视觉线索（不同的大写）在旁视。特别是，当句子的其余部分是正常的大写字母时，读者可能会偏向于将大写字母字符串作为首字母处理。
The processing of abbreviations in reading was examined with an eye movement experiment. Abbreviations were of 2 distinct types: acronyms (abbreviations that can be read with the normal grapheme-phoneme correspondence [GPC] rules, such as NASA) and initialisms (abbreviations in which the GPCs are letter names, such as NCAA). Parafoveal and foveal processing of these abbreviations was assessed with the use of the boundary change paradigm (K. Rayner, 1975). Using this paradigm, previews of the abbreviations were either identical to the abbreviation (NASA or NCAA), orthographically legal (NUSO or NOBA), or illegal (NRSB or NRBA). The abbreviations were presented as capital letter strings within normal, predominantly lowercase sentences and also sentences in all capital letters such that the abbreviations would not be visually distinct. The results indicate that acronyms and initialisms undergo different processing during reading and that readers can modulate their processing based on low-level visual cues (distinct capitalization) in parafoveal vision. In particular, readers may be biased to process capitalized letter strings as initialisms in parafoveal vision when the rest of the sentence is normal, lowercase letters.