LIFE AT HIGH TEMPERATURES - EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ORGANISMS LIVING IN HOT SPRINGS IS DISCUSSED
LIFE AT HIGH TEMPERATURES - EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ORGANISMS LIVING IN HOT SPRINGS IS DISCUSSED
复制标题
DOI:
10.1126/science.158.3804.1012
复制
发表时间:
1967-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
56.9
通讯作者:
BROCK, TD
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
BROCK, TD
The upper temperature for life has not yet been defined. At Yellowstone, some bacteria live and grow essentially at the boiling point. Since increased hydrostatic pressure may permit growth at even higher temperatures there seems to be no reason why bacteria could not live in nature at any temperature where there is liquid water. There is definitely an upper temperature for photosynthetic life, which seems to be at temperatures around 75[degree]C for procaryotic algae. Eu-caryotlc microorganisms are restricted to lower temperatures (less than 60[degree]C), and unicellular and multicellular animals to still lower temperatures (less than 50[degree]C). Blue-green algae living at a given temperature are optimally adapted to that temperature, even if it is near the upper limit for algal growth. These algae are not merely lower temperature forms which have extended their range but are forms which have actually evolved so that their temperature optima resemble their environmental temperatures. The molecular mechanism of ther-mophily is more likely to be related to the function and stability of cellular membranes than to the properties of specific macromolecules. In bacteria, where species have been studied with optima from 15[degree] to 70[degree]C, each organism has many enzymes which are stable at the optimum temperature of the organism, but not at higher temperatures. Organisms do not evolve proteins which are much more stable than they need to be. There may be some advantage to the organism in synthesizing denaturable proteins. There may be a relation between protein denaturability and current ideas concerning induced fit and allosteric interactions of enzymes. Although thermophlles grow somewhat faster at their optima than do mesophlles and psychrophiles at their optima, the increases are considerably less than would be predicted from the Arrhenlus equation. This suggests that thermophlles, even though optimally adapted to their environments, are not able to make full use of their thermal environment. The temperature optima of organisms are not easily changed by mutatloa Thermophilic bacteria and algae are clearly related taxonomically to mesophilic species, and it seems reasonable that one group is derived from the other. One hypothesis has been that thermophillc organisms are relicts, and were more widely distributed on the earth in times when it was hotter than it is today. Thermophillc microorganisms may be related to prlmorldal forms which gave rise, through many mutations followed by selection, to mesophillc and psychrophilic forms.