A‐Movement Scrambling and Options without Optionality

A‐Movement Scrambling and Options without Optionality
复制标题

A-运动加扰和无选择性的选项

DOI:
10.1002/9780470758403.ch8
复制
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Shigeru Miyagawa
Shigeru Miyagawa
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Shigeru Miyagawa

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

罗斯(1967)给这类自由的词序排列起了一个恰当的名字“混乱”。与日语和荷兰语不同,英语不允许乱抢。因此,例如,在英语中排列主语和宾语将从根本上改变句子的意义(约翰看到玛丽;玛丽看到约翰)。在VP中,英语不允许我们在上面看到的荷兰语的词序选择;在正常情况下,宾语必须与动词相邻(斯托威尔,1981)。
It was Ross (1967) who gave the apt name "scrambling" to these types of free word order permutation. Unlike Japanese and Dutch, English does not allow scrambling. Thus, for example, permuting the subject and the object in English would fundamentally alter the meaning of the sentence (John saw Mary; Mary saw John). Within the VP, English does not allow the type of word-order choices we saw above for Dutch; in normal circumstances the object is required to be adjacent to the verb (Stowell 1981).
日本 J.Appl.Phys.24-7。
DOI: --
发表时间: --
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
通讯作者: --