From Huntington to Trump: thirty years of the clash of civilizations
From Huntington to Trump: thirty years of the clash of civilizations
复制标题
从亨廷顿到特朗普:三十年的文明冲突
DOI:
10.1080/09637494.2021.1925416
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Madeley
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Madeley
Samuel Huntington’s 1993 article ‘The Clash of Civilizations?’in the US establishment journal Foreign Affairs was later declared by the editors ‘one of the most influential pieces’ it had ever published. Whether or not it turns out to have been as influential as the same journal’s 1947 article by George Kennan, which is often credited with setting the frame for US Cold War policy, remains to be seen, but the way such agenda-setting think pieces appear to inform and shape the patterning of international relations is a patently important object of contemplation and research. Jeffrey Haynes’ most recent volume is a wide-ranging and multilayered attempt to assess the impact of Huntington’s article on policy and opinion at both international and nation-state levels among scholars, international civil servants, and politicians wrought by the polemic. In doing so, Haynes addresses a number of issues including inter alia the place and role of religion-related issues in world affairs and national politics, topics on which he has already written a great deal.The book is divided into two sections and eight chapters. Over chapters 1 to 4, the first section surveys the historic and ideational background to the tensions and conflicts between the West and, in particular, the world of Islam, especially since the end of the Cold War. The 30 years referenced in the book’s title acts as a reminder that while it was Bernard Lewis who had first used the phrase ‘clash of civilizations’ as early as 1957, it was him again who in 1990 famously expanded on the thesis that the deep-rooted difference in values between Arab Muslim-majority countries and western nations was likely to lead to political conflict. What Huntington more famously did three years later (and expanded further in a 1996 book-length treatment) was to extend the argument to embrace value differences between all of the world’s major civilisational groups on the one hand and, most controversially, to sharpen its relevance to conflicts between the West and the Islamic world on the other. The most controversial implication of his arguments was that it was Islam itself (and not just those versions of it promoted by radical Islamists) that, being fundamentally antithetical to freedom and democracy, presented the greatest challenge to western power. In 2001 the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the USA appeared to many to dramatically confirm this claim and encourage a further series of violent terror incidents which, in turn, provoked the United Statesled Global War on Terror (so-called). Other developments, including the failure of the