Psychological Science Is Not Race Neutral
Psychological Science Is Not Race Neutral
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1745691620979820
复制
发表时间：
2021-03-02
影响因子：
12.6
通讯作者：
Kraus, Michael W.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dupree, Cydney H.;Kraus, Michael W.
在上一期《心理科学展望》中，罗伯茨和他的同事们分析称，心理科学各个子领域的编辑、作者和参与者绝大多数都是白人。在这篇评论中，我们考虑了这种种族不平等的一些驱动因素和后果。借鉴该领域内外的种族学术，我们强调了在心理学中造成和维持种族不平等的三种现象：(A)种族无知，(B)对归属感的威胁，以及(C)种族进步的叙述。我们通过探索期刊和作者可以采取的步骤来减少我们领域的种族不平等，最后呼吁考虑有色人种学者在种族学术和更广泛的心理科学方面的经验。
In their analysis in a previous issue of Perspectives on Psychological Science, Roberts and colleagues argued that the editors, authors, and participants throughout subfields of psychological science are overwhelmingly White. In this commentary, we consider some of the drivers and consequences of this racial inequality. Drawing on race scholarship from within and outside the field, we highlight three phenomena that create and maintain racial inequality in psychology: (a) racial ignorance, (b) threats to belonging, and (c) racial-progress narratives. We close by exploring steps that journals and authors can take to reduce racial inequality in our field, ending with an appeal to consider the experience of scholars of color in race scholarship and in psychological science more broadly.