On the Idea of Treatment Systems
On the Idea of Treatment Systems
复制标题
论处理系统的理念
DOI：
10.1177/145507251002700602
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
A. Bergmark
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Bergmark
本文解决了与使用系统方法研究酒精和毒品问题治疗的组织和特征相关的某些问题。系统概念的使用主要有三种方法。第一个涉及所谓的理性梦想，它往往具有试图改革现状的结构。它以传统的系统概念为指导，认为系统由相互关联的部分组成并构成整体。第二种使用类型的特点是临时方法，因为系统概念的实际使用主要是界定治疗服务的群体，而不是治疗系统的群体。第三种方法可以称为扩展系统方法，因为它强调包含大量关系，这在某种程度上使系统的边界变得不那么明显。虽然这三种方法都是合理且相关的研究策略，但它们不同的局限性可能仍然值得考虑一些替代方案。我建议从市场角度寻找可能的替代方法。这一建议是基于瑞典目前酒精和药物治疗组织的具体背景而提出的。不过，其他国家也并非不可能出现类似的情况。
This article addresses certain problems associated with the use of a system approach in studying the organisation and character of treatment for alcohol and drug problems. There are three main approaches of system concept use. The first concerns what could be called the dream of rationality, which tends to have the structure of an attempt to reform a present state of affairs. It is guided by a traditional system concept, which claims that systems consist of interrelated parts and constitute wholes. The second type of use is characterised by an ad hoc approach inasmuch as the actual use of the system concept is primarily to delimit populations of treatment services, rather than of treatment systems. The third approach can be called the extensive system approach since it emphasises the inclusion of a large number of relations that to some extent make the boundaries of the system less distinct. While all three approaches stand out as reasonable and relevant research strategies, their different limitations may nevertheless make it worthwhile to consider some alternatives. I suggest that a possible alternative approach can be found in a market perspective. This suggestion is premised on the specific context of current alcohol and drug treatment organisation in Sweden. However, it is not impossible that similar circumstances could also be present in other countries.