THIS IS NOT A GUIDE TO INDIGENOUS RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS But it could help
THIS IS NOT A GUIDE TO INDIGENOUS RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS But it could help
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/1369118x.2012.709260
复制
发表时间：
2012-01-01
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Faulkhead, Shannon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Adams, Karen;Faulkhead, Shannon
研究伙伴关系的发展可能会造成混乱，因为没有也不可能有一个循序渐进的社区伙伴关系指南。每一个都是不同的，因为每一个伙伴关系都是独一无二的。本文的目的是揭示原住民研究合作伙伴关系的一些运作方式。在这篇文章中，我们使用一个小型的文献回顾澳大利亚的研究，自我反思和“纱线”的方法来借鉴我们的研究伙伴关系的经验，一直是社区合作伙伴的研究人员，作为研究人员自己与社区合作，土著知识与我们分享，通过合作研究，和社区关系。文献综述是一种工具，以显示研究伙伴关系的方法被视为分层和/或横向的基础上，在文献中的描述的趋势，并说明了一些问题，从土著的角度来看，在西方范式内运作时所经历的。虽然研究伙伴关系可能很复杂，但合作的回报是多方面的，包括所有伙伴的利益和可在社区一级采用的研究成果。新出现的问题包括伙伴关系方法、评价和质量保证。
Development of research partnerships can cause confusion, as there is not and cannot be a step-by-step guidebook to community partnerships. Each one is different because each partnership is unique. The aim of this article is to unpack some of the workings of Indigenous research partnerships. In this article we use a mini-literature review of Australian research, and methods of self-reflection and 'Yarning' to draw on our research partnership experiences of having been community partners to researchers, as researchers ourselves partnering with community, and Indigenous knowledge shared with us through collaborative research, and community relationships. The literature review is a tool to show the tendency for research partnership methods to be viewed as hierarchical and/or lateral based on the descriptions within the literature, and illustrate some of the issues experienced from an Indigenous perspective when operating within a Western paradigm. Although research partnerships can be complex, the rewards of the collaboration are many, including benefits for all partners and research outcomes that can be adopted at the community level. Emerging issues include partnership methodologies, evaluation and quality assurance.