The Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale Short Form: Development and Validation
The Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale Short Form: Development and Validation
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.beth.2011.04.004
复制
发表时间：
2011-12-01
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Luo, Wen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Manos, Rachel C.;Kanter, Jonathan W.;Luo, Wen
在Jacobson及其同事（1996）对认知疗法进行了里程碑式的成分分析之后，人们对抑郁症的行为激活（BA）治疗重新产生了兴趣。抑郁症行为激活量表（BADS）的开发是为了测量何时以及如何客户成为激活在BA治疗过程中。多项研究为BADS提供了初步支持，但也发现了一些潜在的问题。进行了四项研究，以制定和提供初步评价的简短形式的BADS，解决这些问题。在研究1中，使用原始BADS对现有数据进行了探索性因素分析，以确定要保留的项目。在研究2中，这些项目被管理到一个新的样本的大学生与抑郁症状升高，并进行了探索性和验证性因素分析。研究3通过检查BADS-SF和抑郁评分与1周内活动跟踪和奖励价值评级的关系来检查BADS-SF的预测有效性。研究4使用交叉滞后面板相关性检查了两名客户在BA治疗过程中的BADS-SF数据。一个客户端，BADS-SF评分的变化导致抑郁评分的变化，1周，而与其他客户端的BADS-SF和抑郁评分的变化同时发生。这些研究产生了一个九项量表，表现出良好的项目特征以及可接受的内部一致性信度，结构效度和预测效度。
Following a landmark component analysis of cognitive therapy by Jacobson and colleagues (1996), there has been renewed interest in behavioral activation (BA) treatments for depression. The Behavioral Activation for Depression Scale (BADS) was developed to measure when and how clients become activated over the course of BA treatment. Multiple studies have provided initial support for the BADS but have also identified several potential problems. Four studies were conducted in order to develop and provide initial evaluation of a short form of the BADS that addresses these concerns. In Study 1, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted on existing data using the original BADS in order to identify items to retain for the short form. In Study 2, these items were administered to a new sample of college students with elevated depressive symptoms and were analyzed with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Study 3 examined the predictive validity of the BADS-SF by examining the BADS-SF and depression scores in relation to activity tracking and reward-value ratings over the course of 1 week. Study 4 examined BADS-SF data over the course of BA treatment for two clients using cross-lagged panel correlations. With one client, changes in BADS-SF scores led changes in depression scores by 1 week, whereas with the other client changes in BADS-SF and depression scores occurred concurrently. These studies resulted in a nine-item scale that demonstrated good item characteristics as well as acceptable internal consistency reliability, construct validity, and predictive validity.