Taking path dependence seriously: an historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history
Taking path dependence seriously: an historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history
复制标题
认真对待路径依赖：规划历史中的历史制度主义研究议程
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Sorensen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Sorensen
本文概述了一个历史制度主义（HI）的规划史研究议程。HI的方法来理解机构，路径依赖，公共政策中的正反馈效应，以及制度变迁的模式化过程提供了一个强大的理论框架和一套有价值的概念和分析工具，用于分析公共政策的连续性和变化。然而，迄今为止，还没有系统的努力，将历史制度主义纳入规划史研究。本文的主体提出了规划历史相关的机构，路径依赖，关键节点和增量变化过程的定义，概述了最近HI文献应用和扩展这些概念，并制定了一些研究问题，规划历史，这些方法建议。最后一节探讨了潜在的应用和杠杆作用的HI方法的规划历史和国际比较规划研究的研究，并概述了研究议程。
This paper outlines an historical institutionalist (HI) research agenda for planning history. HI approaches to the understanding of institutions, path dependence, positive feedback effects in public policy, and patterned processes of institutional change offer a robust theoretical framework and a valuable set of conceptual and analytic tools for the analysis of continuity and change in public policy. Yet, to date, there has been no systematic effort to incorporate historical institutionalism into planning history research. The body of the paper proposes planning history relevant definitions of institutions, path dependence, critical junctures, and incremental change processes, outlines recent HI literature applying and extending these concepts, and frames a number of research questions for planning history that these approaches suggest. A concluding section explores the potential application and leverage of HI approaches to the study of planning history and international comparative planning studies and outlines a research agenda.