IMPORTANCE OF FIXATION IN IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY - USE OF FORMALDEHYDE SOLUTIONS AT VARIABLE PH FOR THE LOCALIZATION OF TYROSINE-HYDROXYLASE
IMPORTANCE OF FIXATION IN IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY - USE OF FORMALDEHYDE SOLUTIONS AT VARIABLE PH FOR THE LOCALIZATION OF TYROSINE-HYDROXYLASE
复制标题
DOI:
10.1177/29.7.6167611
复制
发表时间:
1981-01-01
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
PUJOL, JF
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
BEROD, A;HARTMAN, BK;PUJOL, JF
Adequate fixative in immunohistochemistry requires not only a rapid and total immobilization of the antigen, but also a sufficient preservation of its immunoreactivity and maintenance of its accessibility to the immunochemical reagents for localization. The optimal fixation condition for a specific antigen necessitates a compromise between these opposing variables and can be determined by the preparation of a series of tissues with a progressively increasing degree of fixation. If localization using such a series is not available the results will be adequate but less than optimal. In the present study, this principle is demonstrated using the localization of tyrosine hydroxylase in the dopaminergic system with formaldehyde as the fixative. The rate and degree of fixation with formaldehyde was highly pH dependent. By perfusing the tissue [rat brain] with formaldehyde at pH 6.5 (where the rate of fixation is extremely slow) it is possible to rapidly distribute the fixative homogeneously into the tissue. By suddenly changing to a formaldehyde perfusate of higher pH, the cross-linking reaction is rapidly increased. This 2-step fixation procedure provides a means of obtaining a rapid and uniform immobilization of the antigen, so that its translocation can be avoided. The final degree of fixation is controlled by the duration and pH of the 2nd fixative solution. The results obtained by increasing the pH of the 2nd solution demonstrated that complete fixation of tyrosine hydroxylase in the dopaminergic system with formaldehyde may be obtained using a very basic formaldehyde solution (pH 11) while still retaining immunoreactivity of the enzyme. The localization that was achieved at lower pH appeared adequate until it was compared to the results obtained by perfusion at pH 11 in the 2nd step.