The roles of encoding and retrieval processes in associative and categorical memory illusions

The roles of encoding and retrieval processes in associative and categorical memory illusions
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jml.2008.09.002
复制
发表时间:
2009
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
S. Dewhurst;E. Bould;Lauren M. Knott;Craig Thorley
S. Dewhurst;E. Bould;Lauren M. Knott;Craig Thorley
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Dewhurst;E. Bould;Lauren M. Knott;Craig Thorley

文献摘要

相似文献

四个实验研究了联想和分类记忆错觉的起源,通过比较研究和测试协会的影响Deese/Roediger-McDermott(DRM)和分类列表。实验1和2发现,这两个列表类型的错误识别的水平增加了操作,促进了在研究中产生的联营公司(阻止介绍的研究列表和明确的指示,以产生联营公司的研究项目)。实验3和4表明,旨在增加测试关联的操作(测试诱导的启动和部分设置提示)并没有增加任何列表类型的错误记忆水平。这些发现表明,DRM和分类列表产生的错误记忆都受到学习时激活的联想的影响,而不是测试时激活的联想。
Four experiments investigated the origin of associative and categorical memory illusions by comparing the effects of study and test associations on Deese/Roediger–McDermott (DRM) and categorized lists. Experiments 1 and 2 found that levels of false recognition with both list types were increased by manipulations that facilitated the generation of associates at study (blocked presentation of study lists and explicit instructions to generate associates of studied items). Experiments 3 and 4 showed that manipulations designed to increase test associations (test-induced priming and part-set cuing) did not increase levels of false memory with either list type. These findings indicate that false memories produced by both DRM and categorized lists are influenced by associations activated at study but not by associations activated at test.