Focus particles, secondary meanings, and Lexical Resource Semantics: The case of Japanese shika

Focus particles, secondary meanings, and Lexical Resource Semantics: The case of Japanese shika
复制标题

焦点助词、次要含义和词汇资源语义:日语 shika 的案例

DOI:
10.21248/hpsg.2011.5
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
Proceedings of the International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Jean
Jean
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Aki Hasegawa;Jean

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

日语中有两个专有的助词“shika”和“dake”。虽然传统上,这两种粒子都是 被认为是排他性的粒子,如“只有”,最近的一项建议声称,“只有”是一个 例外助词,如“每个人都除外”,以解释否定词的必要同现 后缀na'和shika'。我们发现,这个否定后缀缺乏两个关键的语义属性, 普通逻辑否定:它不是向下的蕴涵,也不许可负极性 项目.我们表明,这两个shika'和dake'是排他性粒子,但shika'编码一个 额外的次要意义。否定后缀只对句子的次要成分起作用 意思是当它与“日本式”同时出现时。我们提出了一个HPSG和LRS分析模型, 否定后缀“”与“”的共现及其对句子结构的影响 次要的意义
Japanese has two exclusive particles ˋshika' and ˋdake'. Although traditionally, both particles were considered to be exclusive particles like ˋonly', a recent proposal claims that ˋshika' is an exceptive particle like ˋeveryone except' to account for the necessary co-occurrence of the negative suffix ˋna' and ˋshika'. We show that this negative suffix lacks two critical semantic properties of ordinary logical negation: It is not downward entailing, nor does it license negative polarity items. We show that both ˋshika' and ˋdake' are exclusive particles, but that ˋshika' encodes an additional secondary meaning. The negative suffix only contributes to the sentence's secondary meaning when it co-occurs with ˋshika'. We present an HPSG and LRS analysis that models the co-occurrence of ˋshika' and the negative suffix ˋna', and their contribution to the sentence's secondary meaning.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2006
期刊: English Studies 49
影响因子: --
作者:
Hoshi;Koji
通讯作者: Koji