Patient perceptions of quality of life after coronary artery surgery: was it worth it?
Patient perceptions of quality of life after coronary artery surgery: was it worth it?
复制标题
患者对冠状动脉手术后生活质量的看法：值得吗？
DOI：
10.1002/nur.4770150503
复制
发表时间：
1992
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Reis,HT
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
King,KB;Porter,LA;Norsen,LH;Reis,HT
对155例冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的生活质量和对手术后果的看法进行了检查。手术后一年，认为手术是值得的，因为功能改善的受试者（n= 64）在生活满意度和情绪的主观指标上比那些认为手术是值得的，因为它挽救了他们的生命（n= 62）或那些不确定手术是值得的（n= 23）。两组谁相信手术是值得的生活质量的看法的差异进行了讨论的关注焦点。那些认为功能能力得到改善的人可能会关注手术的具体结果，而那些根据死亡的选择来解释手术的好处的人可能会把注意力集中在恢复的情感方面。研究结果强调，需要使用多层面的方法来研究生活质量。
Quality of life and perceptions of the consequences of surgery were examined in 155 individuals having coronary bypass surgery. One year after surgery, subjects believing surgery was worth it because of functional improvement (n= 64) had more positive scores on subjective indicators of life satisfaction and mood than those believing surgery was worth it because it saved them from death (n= 62) or those who were not sure surgery was worth it (n= 23). Differences in perceptions of quality of life between the two groups who believed surgery was worth it are discussed in terms of focus of attention. Individuals who perceive improved functional ability may focus on concrete outcomes of surgery, whereas those who interpret the benefit of surgery in light of the alternative of death may focus their attention on affective aspects of recovery. Findings emphasize the need for using a multidimensional approach to studying quality of life.