Local K constructions
Local K constructions
复制标题
局部 K 结构
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Steel
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Steel
As one might suspect, the more useful answer would be “yes”. For theK-construction of [2], this question is open. The problem is that the construction of [2] is not local: because of the full-background-extender demand, it may produce mice projecting to ρ at stages much greater than ρ. Because of this, there is no reason to believe that if E is a λ-strong extender of V , then iE( ~ E) λ = ~ E λ. The natural proof only gives that if κ is Σ2-strong, then κ is strong in L[ ~ E]. 1 Since we do not not how to get started on this question, and suspect that in fact (1) may fail for the construction of [2], we shall look instead for a modification of this construction. What we want for our applications is a construction with output L[ ~ E] such that (1) iteration trees on L[ ~ E] can be lifted to iteration trees on V , (2) ∀δ(δ is Woodin ⇒ δ is Woodin in L[ ~ E]), and (3) (a) ∀κ(κ is a strong cardinal ⇒ κ is strong in L[ ~ E]), and (b) ∀κ∀λ(Lim(λ) ∧ κ is λ-strong ⇒ κ is λ-strong in L[ ~ E]). This question, and the observations we have just recorded, are due to R. Jensen.