Retrieval From Memory: Vulnerable or Inviolable?
Retrieval From Memory: Vulnerable or Inviolable?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/a0026781
复制
发表时间：
2012-07-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Hughes, Robert W.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jones, Dylan M.;Marsh, John E.;Hughes, Robert W.
我们表明，检索语义记忆是脆弱的，甚至仅仅存在的讲话。不相关的语音会损害语义流畅性，也就是说，词汇检索由语义类别名称提示，但只有当它是有意义的（前向语音相比，反向语音或单词相比，非单词）。此外，语音相关的语义检索类别是更具有破坏性比无关的语音。参与者被提示要报告的单词的第一个字母的音素流畅性并没有被仅仅存在的有意义的讲话所破坏，只有在相关的音素类别中的讲话，这表明分心不是由执行处理负荷介导的。作为提取线索类型的函数的声音的不同属性的敏感性的模式是符合听觉干扰的处理方法。
We show that retrieval from semantic memory is vulnerable even to the mere presence of speech. Irrelevant speech impairs semantic fluency namely, lexical retrieval cued by a semantic category name but only if it is meaningful (forward speech compared to reversed speech or words compared to nonwords). Moreover, speech related semantically to the retrieval category is more disruptive than unrelated speech. That phonemic fluency in which participants are cued with the first letter of words they are to report was not disrupted by the mere presence of meaningful speech, only by speech in a related phonemic category, suggests that distraction is not mediated by executive processing load. The pattern of sensitivity to different properties of sound as a function of the type of retrieval cue is in line with an interference-by-process approach to auditory distraction.