Designing and validating a measure of moral judgment: Stage preference and stage consistency approaches.
Designing and validating a measure of moral judgment: Stage preference and stage consistency approaches.
复制标题
设计和验证道德判断的衡量标准：阶段偏好和阶段一致性方法。
DOI：
10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.5
复制
发表时间：
1997
影响因子：
4.9
通讯作者：
L. Edwards
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
James R. Rest;S. Thoma;L. Edwards
根据G.Lind(1995)最近对欧洲广泛使用的道德判断测试(MJT)提出的挑战，讨论了道德判断的定义问题测试(DIT)。这两个测试代表了不同的方法，也支持了关于道德判断的不同结论。关键区别在于阶段一致性(MJT)方法与阶段偏好(DIT)方法。根据7种研究类型对结构效度进行了定义，并对各种方法进行了比较。阶段偏好方法系统地优于阶段一致性方法。通过使用道德判断中的经典研究进行标杆研究，展示了一种经验性的、多项研究、量化的道德判断研究方法。
The Defining Issues Test (DIT) of moral judgment is discussed in light of the recent challenge by G. Lind (1995) with the Moral Judgment Test (MJT), which is widely used in Europe. The 2 tests represent alternative methods as well as support different conclusions about moral judgment. The key difference is a stage-consistency (MJT) vs. a stage-preference (DIT) approach. Construct validity is defined in terms of 7 types of studies, and the approaches are compared. The stage-preference approach systematically outperforms the stage-consistency approach. Benchmarking by using classic studies in moral judgment illustrates an empirical, multistudy, quantitative approach to moral judgment research.