Zur Systematisierung von Planungsprozessen
Zur Systematisierung von Planungsprozessen
复制标题
规划过程的系统化
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Sarah Oberding
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Hoffmann;Sarah Oberding
摘要近几十年来，许多作者对规划过程进行了描述。因此，本文提出了规划过程模型的系统化。该分析考虑了30个规划过程，自20世纪50年代以来，已经开发，无论是源于空间规划或可以应用于空间过程。系统化是使用分析标准进行的：规划过程和方法的过程。规划过程的30种模式可以分为三大类：经典模式、增量模式和战略模式，尽管大多数属于经典模式。经典模型和战略模型根据规划过程的进程进一步区分，即分为线性模型和循环模型。除了计划过程的标准过程之外，这些群体在方法的使用上也特别不同。目标发现和计划管理方法主要是为经典模型而提出的;相比之下，分析和参与的方法在战略模型中发挥着重要作用。增量模型中使用的方法学方法是根据具体情况单独制定的;因此，对于这些模型，通常避免提出适当方法的建议。
Abstract In recent decades planning processes have been described by many authors. This article therefore proposes a systematization of planning process models. The analysis considers 30 planning processes that have been developed since the 1950s and that either originate from spatial planning or can be applied to spatial processes. Systematization is carried out using analytical criteria: the course of planning process and methods. The 30 models of planning process can be divided into three main groups: classic, incremental and strategic models, although the majority fall into the classic group. The classic and strategic models are further differentiated according to the course of the planning process, i.e. into linear and circular models. Alongside the criterion course of planning process, these groups are especially distinguished from one another by their use of methods. Goal finding and planning management methods are primarily proposed for use with the classic models; in contrast, methods of analysis and participation play an important role within the strategic models. The methodological approach used in the incremental models is individually developed in line with the specific situation; thus, for these models proposals for appropriate methods are usually avoided.