THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN AND PHYSICAL FACTORS IN COLLEGIATE POLE VAULTERS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN AND PHYSICAL FACTORS IN COLLEGIATE POLE VAULTERS: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY
复制标题
DOI：
10.26603/ijspt20200537
复制
发表时间：
2020-08-01
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Shimizu, Takuya
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Enoki, Shota;Kuramochi, Rieko;Shimizu, Takuya
背景：腰背是撑杆跳运动员最常见的损伤部位，腰痛（LBP）很容易成为慢性疼痛。因此，了解反复发生腰痛的运动员的身体特征可能有助于恢复和预防损伤。目的：本研究的目的是描述和分析患有慢性腰痛的撑杆跳运动员的身体特征。研究设计：横断面研究方法：20名男子撑杆跳高运动员参与本研究。调查问卷用于收集描述性和个人数据，包括个人在撑杆跳高中的最佳成绩。此外，还测量了以下物理特征：1)髋关节和膝关节屈肌和伸肌的等动肌力，2)多个关节和区域的主动/被动运动范围和肌肉柔韧性，3)功能运动屏幕（TM） （FMS (TM)）的表现，4)脊柱对齐。采用问卷对受试者进行分类，并将其分为两组，一组为慢性下腰痛，另一组为非慢性下腰痛。结果：慢性腰痛组在主动直腿抬高测试（SLR）中的个人最佳成绩和角度分别明显低于非慢性腰痛组和非慢性腰痛组。此外，慢性LBP组被动单反角和主动单反角（Delta SLR）的差异显著大于非慢性LBP组。患有慢性腰痛的患者更有可能获得FMS （TM）综合评分
Background: The low back is the most common injury location in pole vaulters, and low back pain (LBP) can easily become chronic. Therefore, knowing the physical characteristics of athletes experiencing repeated LBP may be beneficial for recovery and injury prevention.Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze the physical characteristics of pole vaulters with chronic LBP.Study Design: A cross-sectional studyMethods: Twenty male pole vaulters participated in this study. A questionnaire was used to garner descriptive and personal data, including personal best performance in the pole vault. Additionally, the following physical characteristics were measured: 1) isokinetic muscle strength of hip and knee flexors and extensors, 2) active/passive range of motion and muscle flexibility in multiple joints and regions, 3) performance on the Functional Movement Screen (TM) (FMS (TM)) and 4) spinal column alignment. Subjects were categorized using the questionnaire and divided into two groups, one with and one without chronic LBP.Results: The personal best performance and angle on the active straight leg raise test (SLR) were significantly lower and smaller, respectively, in the chronic LBP group than in the non-chronic LBP group. Additionally, the difference between the passive SLR angle and active SLR angle (Delta SLR) was significantly larger in the chronic LBP group than in the non-chronic LBP group. Those with chronic LBP had were more likely to have a FMS (TM) composite score