Spatial Analysis of Pottery Presence at the Former Pobedim Hillfort (an Archeological Site in Slovakia)
Spatial Analysis of Pottery Presence at the Former Pobedim Hillfort (an Archeological Site in Slovakia)
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/su11236873
复制
发表时间：
2019-12
期刊：
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Jana Vojteková;Matej Vojtek;A. Tirpáková;I. Vlkolinská
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jana Vojteková;Matej Vojtek;A. Tirpáková;I. Vlkolinská
本研究利用空间自相关和克里格插值两种空间统计方法，在GIS的帮助下，对斯洛伐克Pobedim山卫城部分陶器（陶器碎片）的赋存情况进行了空间分析，并进行了后续比较。为了了解研究区景观，绘制了1783-1785年、1845年、1882年、1956年、1971年、2010年和2017年7幅不同历史年份的土地利用图，确认研究区主要为耕地，这与Horný Dudvah河和Dubova河之间的河滩位置有利有关。利用Moran空间自相关系数分析，发现该区有7个高-高聚类和3个高-低聚类代表陶片的发生。利用克里格插值法，发现了三个高浓度簇。随后对两种方法进行比较，发现了三个相同的陶器出现频率高的区域，这些区域表明了重要的定居物体所在的地方，比如富人的住所、陶器作坊等。两种方法在陶器碎片数量较多的区域之间的差异约为12%，这表明两种方法之间的匹配是可以接受的，并且在空间（地理）考古研究中具有适用性。
The aim of this study was a spatial analysis of the pottery occurrence (potsherds) in the acropolis part of the Pobedim hillfort (Slovakia) using two spatial statistical methods (spatial autocorrelation and kriging interpolation) with the help of GIS and their subsequent comparison. To understand the landscape of the study area, seven land use maps were created for different historical years (1783–1785, 1845, 1882, 1956, 1971, 2010 and 2017) confirming that the study area was predominantly utilized as arable land, which was related to advantageous floodplain location between the rivers of Horný Dudvah and Dubova. Using the Moran coefficient of spatial autocorrelation, it was found that there were seven high–high clusters and three high–low clusters representing the occurrence of potsherds. Using the kriging interpolation, three clusters of high concentration were found. Subsequent comparison of both methods revealed three identical areas with high frequency of pottery occurrence indicating places where significant settlement objects were located, such as the dwelling of a wealthy man, pottery workshop and the like. The difference between the areas with high number of potsherds between the two methods is approximately 12%, which indicates an acceptable match between the two methods and their applicability for spatial (geographic)–archaeological research.