Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group psychotherapy: Multilevel structural equation models
Group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy in group psychotherapy: Multilevel structural equation models
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.310
复制
发表时间：
2005-07-01
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Gleave, RL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Johnson, JE;Burlingame, GM;Gleave, RL
本研究探讨了4个关键的群体治疗关系结构的定义和统计重叠的群体气候，凝聚力，联盟和同情心，跨成员成员，成员组，和成员领导人的关系。三个多层次结构方程模型进行了测试，使用自我报告的措施完成的662名参与者从111个咨询中心和个人成长团体。正如假设的那样，几乎所有治疗关系的指标都显着相关。假设的1-因素、2-因素（工作因素和联系因素）和3-因素（成员、领导者和团队因素）模型与数据拟合不充分。一个探索性的模型，结合，工作和消极因素提供了最佳的拟合数据。小组成员主要根据关系质量而不是其他人的地位或角色来区分关系（即，领导者、成员或整个团队）。
This study examined the definitional and statistical overlap among 4 key group therapeutic relationship constructs-group climate, cohesion, alliance, and empathy-across member-member, member-group, and member-leader relationships. Three multilevel structural equation models were tested using self-report measures completed by 662 participants from 111 counseling center and personal growth groups. As hypothesized, almost all measures of therapeutic relationship were significantly correlated. Hypothesized 1-factor, 2-factor (Working and Bonding factors), and 3-factor (Member, Leader, and Group factors) models did not fit the data adequately. An exploratory model with Bonding, Working, and Negative factors provided the best fit to the data. Group members distinguished among relationships primarily according to relationship quality rather than the status or role of others (i.e., leader, member, or whole group).