Drops in the bucket? A review of onshore responses to Somali piracy
Drops in the bucket? A review of onshore responses to Somali piracy
复制标题
滴在桶里？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Christian Bueger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Christian Bueger
海盗问题需要在陆上解决，这是一个广泛的共识。虽然大多数打击海盗的措施集中在海上，但已经启动了一些陆上打击海盗的举措。我们可以观察到另一种基于土地的政策方法的种子。一套陆基计划旨在加强法律和安全国家机构，以更好地威慑和惩罚海盗。另一套方案旨在解决地区、部族或村庄各级的当地人口。这些项目旨在加强监督，使民众对海盗行为的后果更加敏感，并提供康复或其他谋生机会。在本文中，我将回顾后一种类型的项目，并讨论通过此类措施解决盗版问题的前景和困难。我讨论了五个主要问题：知识问题，实施问题，反直觉的后果，反海盗战略的其他部分的紧张局势，以及援助的证券化。
That piracy needs to be addressed onshore is a widely shared assumption. While the majority of counter-piracy measures focus on the sea, a number of onshore counter-piracy initiatives have been launched. We can observe the seeds of an alternative land-based policy approach. One set of land-based programs aims at strengthening the legal and security state apparatus to better deter and punish pirates. The other set of programs aims at addressing local populations on regional, clan or village levels. Such projects aim at increasing surveillance, sensitizing populations for the consequences of piracy, and providing rehabilitation or alternative livelihood opportunities. In this article, I review the latter type of projects and discuss the promises and difficulties of addressing piracy by such measures. I discuss five major problems: knowledge problems, implementation problems, counterintuitive consequences, tensions towards other parts of counter-piracy strategy, and the securitization of aid.