Presidential Versus Parliamentary Systems: Where Do Female Entrepreneurs Thrive?
Presidential Versus Parliamentary Systems: Where Do Female Entrepreneurs Thrive?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/ssqu.12851
复制
发表时间：
2020-08
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
R. Goel;M. A. Nelson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Goel;M. A. Nelson
本文探讨了女性经理和女性企业主是否在总统制民主或议会制民主中获得更好的权力。议会民主制可能更能满足特殊利益集团的需求，而总统制民主制可能更能简化政府决策。MethodsWe使用世界银行100多个新兴和发展中国家的企业级数据，并采用逻辑估计程序。ResultsResults结果显示，企业的女性所有者在总统制民主制中茁壮成长，但对女性管理人员的影响在统计上基本上微不足道。其他有趣的研究结果包括女性管理人员和女性业主面临的特殊挑战，在国家更大的性别不平等，女性业主受益于国家有一个更大的非正规sector.ConclusionsOur的结果表明，民主的类型是相关的女性创业，与女性业主的公司蓬勃发展的总统制民主国家，但不一定是女性管理人员。
ObjectiveThis article examines whether female managers and female owners of firms are better empowered in presidential or parliamentary democracies. Parliamentary democracies might be more responsive to the demands of special interest groups, while government decision making might be more streamlined in presidential democracies.MethodsWe use firm‐level data from the World Bank for more than 100 emerging and developing nations and employ the logistic estimation procedure.ResultsResults show that female owners of firms thrive in presidential democracies, but the effects on female managers were largely statistically insignificant. Other interesting findings include both female managers and female owners facing special challenges in nations with greater gender inequality, with female owners benefiting in nations with a larger informal sector.ConclusionsOur results show that the type of democracy is relevant in female entrepreneurship, with female owners of firms thriving in presidential democracies, but not necessarily female managers.