Competing risk of death: an important consideration in studies of older adults.
Competing risk of death: an important consideration in studies of older adults.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02767.x
复制
发表时间:
2010-04
影响因子:
6.3
通讯作者:
Kiel DP
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Berry SD;Ngo L;Samelson EJ;Kiel DP
Clinical studies are often faced with the difficult problem of how to account for participants who die without experiencing the study outcome of interest. In a geriatric population with considerable co-morbidities, the competing risk of death is especially high. Traditional approaches to describe risk of disease include Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression; however, these methods can overestimate risk of disease by failing to account for the competing risk of death. In this report, we discuss traditional survival analysis and competing risk analysis as used to estimate risk of disease in geriatric studies. Furthermore, we provide an illustration of a competing risk approach to estimate risk of second hip fracture in the Framingham Osteoporosis Study, and we compare the results with traditional survival analysis. In this example, survival analysis overestimated the five-year risk of second hip fracture by 37% and the ten-year risk by 75% compared with competing risk estimates. We conclude, that in studies of older individuals in which a substantial number of participants die during a long follow-up, the Cumulative Incidence Competing Risk (CICR) estimate and Competing Risk Regression (CRR) should be used to determine incidence and effect estimates. Use of a competing risk approach is critical to accurately determine disease risk for elderly individuals, and therefore best inform clinical decision-making.