Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Sante Cohort Study
Comparison Between a Self-Administered and Supervised Version of a Web-Based Cognitive Test Battery: Results From the NutriNet-Sante Cohort Study
复制标题
DOI：
10.2196/jmir.4862
复制
发表时间：
2016-04-01
影响因子：
7.4
通讯作者：
Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Assmann, Karen E.;Bailet, Marion;Kesse-Guyot, Emmanuelle
背景资料：痴呆症是一个主要的公共卫生问题，来自大型流行病学研究的重复认知数据可能有助于制定有效的早期预防措施。通过自我管理的在线工具收集数据可以大大减少这种大规模调查的后勤和财政负担。在这种情况下，重要的是要获得有关数据的可比性，这种新的在线工具与传统的，监督模式的认知assessment.Objective：我们的目标是比较自我管理的基于Web的NutriNet-Sante认知测试电池（NutriCog），由神经心理学家施用。测试组合包括四项测试，测量心理速度、注意力、执行功能、情景记忆、工作记忆和联想记忆等方面。189名志愿者完成了两个版本的认知测试（首先自我管理版本，n= 99，或首先监督版本，n= 90）。受试者还完成了满意度调查问卷。一致性进行了评估斯皮尔曼correlations.Results：两个版本之间的协议根据不同的认知任务和结果变量。斯皮尔曼相关系数介于0.42和0.73之间。此外，大多数参与者回答说，他们“绝对“或“相当“同意自我管理电池的持续时间是可以接受的（184/185，99.5%），认为任务是有趣的（162/185，87.6%），说明书足够详细（168/185; 90.8%）和可理解（164/185，88.7%），他们总体上喜欢测试电池结论：基于网络的NutriCog认知测试组合的自我管理版本提供了与监督版本相似的信息。因此，通过实施自我管理的在线版本的传统测试组合，将重复的认知评估整合到大型队列中似乎是可行的。
Background: Dementia is a major public health problem, and repeated cognitive data from large epidemiological studies could help to develop efficient measures of early prevention. Data collection by self-administered online tools could drastically reduce the logistical and financial burden of such large-scale investigations. In this context, it is important to obtain data concerning the comparability of such new online tools with traditional, supervised modes of cognitive assessment.Objective: Our objective was to compare self-administration of the Web-based NutriNet-Sante cognitive test battery (NutriCog) with administration by a neuropsychologist.Methods: The test battery included four tests, measuring, among others aspects, psychomotor speed, attention, executive function, episodic memory, working memory, and associative memory. Both versions of the cognitive battery were completed by 189 volunteers (either self-administered version first, n= 99, or supervised version first, n= 90). Subjects also completed a satisfaction questionnaire. Concordance was assessed by Spearman correlation.Results: Agreement between both versions varied according to the investigated cognitive task and outcome variable. Spearman correlations ranged between.42 and.73. Moreover, a majority of participants responded that they "absolutely "or "rather "agreed that the duration of the self-administered battery was acceptable (184/185, 99.5%), that the tasks were amusing (162/185, 87.6%), that the instructions were sufficiently detailed (168/185; 90.8%) and understandable (164/185, 88.7%), and that they had overall enjoyed the test battery (182/185, 98.4%).Conclusions: The self-administered version of the Web-based NutriCog cognitive test battery provided similar information as the supervised version. Thus, integrating repeated cognitive evaluations into large cohorts via the implementation of self-administered online versions of traditional test batteries appears to be feasible.