Triglyceride Glucose Index and Related Parameters (Triglyceride Glucose-Body Mass Index and Triglyceride Glucose-Waist Circumference) Identify Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Liver Fibrosis in Individuals with Overweight/Obesity

Triglyceride Glucose Index and Related Parameters (Triglyceride Glucose-Body Mass Index and Triglyceride Glucose-Waist Circumference) Identify Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver and Liver Fibrosis in Individuals with Overweight/Obesity
复制标题

DOI:
10.1089/met.2020.0109
复制
发表时间:
2020-12-01
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
Alaei-Shahmiri, Fariba
Alaei-Shahmiri, Fariba
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Khamseh, Mohammad E.;Malek, Mojtaba;Alaei-Shahmiri, Fariba

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:甘油三酯葡萄糖(TyG)指数已被提议作为非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)的可靠替代标志物。此外,NAFLD与肥胖密切相关。本研究旨在比较TyG指数及其相关参数(TyG-腰围[WC]和TyG-体重指数[BMI]),包括TyG和肥胖标志物,在预测NAFLD和肝纤维化的超重/肥胖个体无diabetes.Methods:这是一个横断面研究,包括184超重/肥胖的人(96与88没有NAFLD),30-65岁。使用已建立的公式计算TyG、TyG-BMI和TyG-WC。结果:在相关分析中,CAP和LSM与WC、BMI、TyG、TyG-BMI和TyG-WC显著相关。回归分析强调TyG-WC是NAFLD的重要预测因子,标准化比值比最高(2.25,P < 0.001);而肝纤维化与TyG-BMI的相关性更强。在受试者工作特征(ROC)分析中,TyG-WC显示出NAFLD检测的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)最大(0.693,95%置信区间[CI]:0.617-0.769)。然而,TyG-BMI是肝纤维化的更好鉴别因素(AUC:0.635,95%CI:0.554-0.714)。TyG-WC值为876(敏感性:81.3%,特异性:52.3%)和TyG-BMI值为259(敏感性:78.3%,特异性:51.3%)分别是预测NAFLD和肝纤维化的最佳截断点。TyG-BMI和TyG-WC可以可靠地预测该人群中的肝纤维化。这些指标似乎是在临床环境中筛查NAFLD和肝纤维化的简单,实用和负担得起的工具。
Background: The triglyceride glucose (TyG) index has been proposed as a reliable surrogate marker for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Furthermore, NAFLD is strongly related with obesity. This study aimed to compare TyG index and its related parameters (TyG-waist circumference [WC] and TyG-body mass index [BMI]), comprising TyG and obesity markers, in predicting NAFLD and liver fibrosis in overweight/obese individuals without diabetes.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study consisting of 184 overweight/obese people (96 with and 88 without NAFLD), 30-65 years of age. TyG, TyG-BMI, and TyG-WC were computed using the established formula. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) were determined by transient elastography (FibroScan).Results: In correlation analyses, CAP and LSM were significantly associated with WC, BMI, TyG, TyG-BMI, and TyG-WC. Regression analyses highlighted TyG-WC as a significant predictor of NAFLD, with the highest standardized odds ratio (2.25, P < 0.001); while liver fibrosis was associated more strongly with TyG-BMI. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, TyG-WC showed the largest area under the ROC curve (AUC) for detection of NAFLD (0.693, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.617-0.769). However, TyG-BMI was a better discriminator of liver fibrosis (AUC: 0.635, 95% CI: 0.554-0.714). TyG-WC value of 876 (sensitivity: 81.3%, specificity: 52.3%) and TyG-BMI value of 259 (sensitivity: 78.3%, specificity: 51.3%) were the optimal cutoff points to predict NAFLD and liver fibrosis, respectively.Conclusions: The results highlight the significant associations of TyG and its related indices with NAFLD, with TyG-WC being a better indicator. TyG-BMI and TyG-WC could reliably predict liver fibrosis in this population. These indices appear to be simple, practical, and affordable tools for screening NAFLD and liver fibrosis in clinical settings.