Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university
Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.respol.2004.03.004
复制
发表时间：
2004-10-01
期刊：
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Matt, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Carayol, N;Matt, M
本文从实验室层面对科研成果进行了分析。这项研究所基于的证据准确地描述了1993-2000年期间路易·巴斯德大学80多个实验室的研究活动，路易·巴斯德大学是一所排名良好的大型研究型大学。对实验室的研究组织进行了分析，重点是研究人员的特征与出版物和专利这两个成果的分数之间的关系。本文提出了实验室的五种类型，突出了实验室层面上不同类型的研究组织和生产力。并对实验室出版绩效的决定因素进行了研究。我们展示了学术实验室中适当的投入组合如何与高出版业绩密切相关。我们发现，在实验室中结合全职研究人员和大学教授往往会保持激励。高度公开的实验室也获得了专利。还强调了实验室的规模、个人晋升以及非常任研究人员和非研究人员的作用。(C)2004爱思唯尔B.V.保留所有权利。
The paper analyses scientific research production at the laboratory level. The evidence on which the study is based describes precisely the research activity over the period 1993-2000 of more than eighty labs belonging to Louis Pasteur University, a large and well-ranked European research university. The research organization of the labs is analysed by focusing on the characteristics of the research personnel in relation with the scores in two outcomes that are publications and patents. The paper proposes a five-classes typology of laboratories that highlights different styles of research organization and productivity at the laboratory level. It also studies the determinants of the publication performances of labs. We show how appropriate combinations of inputs in academic labs may be strongly associated to high publication performances. We find that combining full-time researchers and university professors in labs tend to preserve incentives. Highly publishing labs also patent. The size of the labs, the individual promotions, and the role of non-permanent researchers and of non-researchers are also underlined. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.