Digital Evidence Education in Schools of Law
Digital Evidence Education in Schools of Law
复制标题
法学院的数字证据教育
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Endicott
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Aaron Alva;B. Endicott
对康涅狄格诉朱莉·阿梅罗一案的研究，让我们深入了解了对数字证据普遍缺乏理解是如何导致无辜被告被错误定罪的。相比之下，洛林诉马克尔美国保险公司（Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Co.）一案长达101页的意见书提供了法律先例，并详细考虑了接纳数字证据的问题。通过对这两个案例的分析，作者建议在法学院的课程中增加一些内容，旨在提高法律界的意识，以确保像Amero案这样的司法悲剧不会在未来发生。讨论了华盛顿大学正在进行的旨在解决这一缺陷的工作。
An examination of State of Connecticut v. Julie Amero provides insight into how a general lack of understanding of digital evidence can cause an innocent defendant to be wrongfully convicted. By contrast, the 101-page opinion in Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Co. provides legal precedence and a detailed consideration for the admission of digital evidence. An analysis of both cases leads the authors to recommend additions to Law School curricula designed to raise the awareness of the legal community to ensure such travesties of justice, as in the Amero case, don’t occur in the future. Work underway at the University of Washington designed to address this deficiency is discussed.